Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Ft. Hood and the suicide of Western Civilization

The jihadist Major Nidal Malik Hasan's attack on servicemen at Ft. Hood once again proves that we face a deranged enemy that must be defeated.


However, the real story here is America's willing cooperation in its own defeat. A half-century of hyper-sensitive political correctness is beginning to take a serious toll on our country. My point is well encapsulated by the statement of the Army Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George Casey, following the incident:



Our diversity not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.


Yes, you heard that right. Losing our "diversity" (which apparently is defined by having a known Islamist sympathizer in a high-ranking army position) would be worse than losing the 13 servicemen that were mercilessly gunned down at Ft. Hood.


Frankly, this statement amazes even me. In this day and age in America, it is deemed more important to have impeccable multicultural "diversity" credentials than it is to protect the lives of our citizens and servicemen. If a few people have to die in the name of "diversity", then so be it!


General Casey should be removed from his position for his insensitive and downright dangerous view on this incident. I won't hold my breath, as I'm pretty sure his boss shares the opinion.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

The President wasn't lying....

Joe Wilson apologized to President Obama for the manner in which he shouted at the President, calling him a liar during his speech on health care to a joint session of Congress on September 9, 2009, but he should also apologize on the substance. President Obama did not lie. Here’s what the President said before Rep. Wilson shouted out.

“There are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This too is false. The reforms I’m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.”

Now parse those words. President Obama is telling the truth about his reform proposal. He’s just hoping those listening don’t comprehend what his words actually mean. Reform opponents are not claiming that reform would INSURE illegals, they claim that reform would NOT insure illegals. They claim, rightly so, that this reform does not address the illegal immigrant problem vis-à-vis health care. Obama says reform would NOT apply to illegals. He’s absolutely right!

Illegals would not have to get insurance. They would not have to provide documentation to the IRS that they are insured by a government approved plan. They would not have to carry cards or documentation everywhere they go to prove they are covered. They will not have to pay the taxes that are sure to come as the program grows and corruption, waste, fraud and abuse proliferate (as with all government programs).

All they have to do is continue doing what they are already doing – go into any emergency room and get all the care they need and walk out again without paying a dime.

President Obama was telling the truth – illegals won’t be insured; this law will not apply to them. They’ll get everything for free like they do now and we’ll all end up paying the bill, as we do now.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

The Rabbit Hole

"The senator’s actions in the hours and days after emerging from that pond tell us something ugly about Kennedy the man. That he got away with it tells us something ugly about American public life." Mark Steyn

Amidst the hagiography of this weekend's laying to rest of the mortal remains of one man, Steyn reminds us that we're all complicit when we allow the truth to slide down the rabbit hole.

Remember that Robert Packwood, Republican Senator, was driven from public life (when was the last time you heard his name) because he patted a woman's bum in the elevator. His biggest regret? That he wasn't a liberal Democrat. He'd be sitting in Harry Reid's seat now if that were the case.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjZlNjA1MTRmYWViNjMwMDUyNjc1ZTg0NDQwZjk2ODc=&w=MA==

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Objects of Cultural Disdain

John Podhoretz, the movie critic refers to "Object(s) of Cultural Piety" or OCP. Once something or someone becomes an OCP, it (or he/she) must be the subject of veneration. As a movie critic, he points out that once the commercially genius Steven Spielberg (Jaws, Raiders, Jurassic Park) directed Schindler's List, he went from venerated because he could make money to someone just plain venerated. This is when he became an OCP. No matter what sludge he has produced or directed in subsequent years (Lost World, the latest Indiana Jones movie), no one can criticize him. Podhoretz makes the same case for Pixar whose last two movies have been duds when compared with Toy Story or Nemo.

I was thinking about his great point when I saw this today...

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/09/letterman-top-ten-palin-has-a-slutty-flight-attendant-look/

David Letterman's "joke" about 14 year old Willow Palin is so beyond the pale that I couldn't understand how a mainstream TV personality could possible get away with it.... And then I understood. Sarah Palin is an OCD - an Object of Cultural Disdain. All the right people hate her and so they can laugh at the thought of her little girl having sex with Alex Rodriguez in the dugout. And they all think that the people who watch his show would laugh too and it never crossed their small minds that people just might be offended.

Sarah Palin is a big girl and can take it even though the mischaracterizations of her are untrue, unfair and insulting. But you know how far down the "cool" list she is when someone like Letterman feels he can say such crude things about her child and not just get a way with it, but be slapped on the back as a great comedian.

Of course it also made me wonder how fast he would have been fined, fired and roasted over open coals if he had dared say something like that about Malia Obama (she's 11). As well he should be. How much hate does it take for a Letterman (or an audience member or viewer who laughed) to not see that? The problem with the veneration of the Obamas (OCP's if there ever were any) is that the worshipers of gods always need devils to hate. And sometimes those devils turn out to be innocent children.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

So is there a middle ground in the abortion debate?

Regina Brett, columnist for the Cleveland Plain Dealer, wrote this today:

http://www.cleveland.com/brett/blog/index.ssf/2009/06/abortion_debate_needs_to_inclu.html

I figured that I'd try to answer her question.... Here's my reply to her:

Ms. Brett -

I read your Plain Dealer article on abortion today with interest. Your article basically answers the question you ask at the beginning as to why those "in the middle" are quiet - it's ambivalence. You know life is precious. You have your own joyful experience to attest to that. But you also know that life presents great challenges to us as well, and we want to have all options available to us to resolve those challenges. That is where the rubber meets the road, so to speak.

You speak of your wanted grandchild with love and affection. You speak of the unborn child of a 17 year old who doesn't want to be pregnant with more detachment (naturally - there's no relationship). But what's the difference between those two fetuses? One is wanted and one is not? Is that how we value human life? Sadly, it is. And that's what makes abortion such a corrosive issue. If life is precious, how can we close our hearts to precious life - any precious little life? The unborn child of that 17 year old is of no less value than your grandchild, is he/she? How can humans with warm hearts actually think in those terms? But we do when it comes to the political issue of abortion. Insisting that they are "equal under the law" would make us pro-life. Insisting they are not makes us pro-choice. But how do we describe those who want to believe those two lives are equally precious, but don't want to tell that 17 year old what to do with "her body?" It makes us confused and unable to reconcile those positions. That's why we stay quiet. We can't face our own moral confusion, so we shrug our shoulders and keep our mouths shut.

It's politically unpopular to proclaim all life to be precious, but in every other aspect of our lives, except abortion, we do that. We give thanks when a child overcomes cancer - because life is precious. We take part in relays for life to cure cancer - because life is precious. We mourn the loss of our oldest relative who has passed - because life is precious. We recoil in horror at the holocaust, at the memory of 9/11 and at senseless gun crimes - because life is precious. But we avert our eyes when we walk past a Planned Parenthood clinic - because life is precious, but those lives aren't protected because we don't want to impose our values and tell someone what to do with their own challenges.

So we remain silent. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. For years, I wanted to have it both ways too. I tried to reconcile my own precious children's lives with the "need" for legalized abortion on demand. I finally realized that I could not. I work to protect those little lives by supporting services like Maggie's Place - a new facility in Cleveland that takes in pregnant women who wish to keep or adopt out their babies. I try to make people aware that our abortion laws are toothless. Women do not have enough protection against predatory abortion providers - they are not given options and our culture doesn't insist that they receive them. Our culture doesn't support adoption and we should do more to do, as you say, focus on preventing abortion.

My hope and prayer is that every woman would be careful with her body and not put herself in a position to have to choose abortion, that she would value life so much that she would take responsibility and I pray that all of us would support her if she is pregnant and cannot support both herself and he child. We must do more, Regina. I thank you for bringing this up. I hope we can all find more answers - but the most important thing we must do is to face the question you raised today - and loudly proclaim that all life is precious and we will do all we can to change a culture that merely wishes to dispose of life when it's not wanted. That, Regina is no answer.

Thanks and best wishes.

Pam

Monday, June 1, 2009

John Brown and George Tiller

The death of abortionist George Tiller at the hands of a cold-blooded murderer has the left agitated and excited about an opportunity. Within an hour of his death, the blogs were alive with accusations that talk radio, right-wing blogs and anyone who is pro-life had blood on their hands and insinuated that "rhetoric" was the cause of this murder.

They want to equate those of us who value life, who believe abortion on demand to be a stain on our country and, most importantly, speak up about the issue, with a murderous individual. It suits them to use this tragedy for Tiller's family for their own purposes - to try to shut us up.

Democrats have done this before. In 1859, John Brown, an ardent abolitionist, incited a deadly insurrection at Harper's Ferry to draw attention to the plight of the slave. Abraham Lincoln, condemned him as a "misguided fanatic." But Southern democrats alleged that his rebellion was the tip of the abolitionist iceberg and represented the wishes of Lincoln and the Republican Party. It was in their best interest to tie this fanatic with legitimate abolitionists.

Not one mainstream pro-life organization or individual will stand with the man who took Tiller's life. (Interestingly enough, there were plenty of mainstream abolitionists who did stand with John Brown - among them Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau who praised his actions.)

George Tiller's death is a tragedy for his family. He is a victim of a murderous hatred. He is not a victim of the pro-life movement. I fear that his death will be all the excuse many need to equate speech with action and will attempt (and may succeed) in shutting us up. If that happens, every American who values free speech will be able to mark Sunday, May 31 as the day free speech died along with George Tiller.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Mark Steyn is inspiration...

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YWU3ZmJjODBjMTllNTg2ZTk5MGZiMWU1NTM5ZTMzMjU=

It is lonely over here on the right, but I know from history, from understanding human nature and basic common sense, what works. Socialism doesn't work. Libertarianism doesn't work. Anarchy doesn't work, monarchy doesn't work, feudalism doesn't work, communism doesn't work (do we even really need to say that anymore??), fascism doesn't work, corporatism doesn't work. The only thing that works is what has made the USA the strongest, richest, most free, most generous, most tolerant nation in the history of mankind. Ordered liberty. Free enterprise secured by a moral people who think that respecting and trying to live up to the 10 commandments and the golden rule is a good way to live life. What drives me crazy is why intelligent people do not seem to understand this - what's right in front of their eyes. There is no utopia - there is no perfection. Human beings over the course of thousands of years, have tried every which way to organize themselves and when it's finally found, (our constitution) we are so eager to discard it....

All nationalized healthcare guarantees you is a place in line...

It's illegal in Canada for a doctor to receive payment from a willing patient for medical treatment denied by the national healthcare board - even if that treatment is the only thing standing between the patient and death. If you have terminal cancer in England, you will not be allowed to receive drugs, available in the US, that may extend your life. The government board has deemed it not cost effective and the individual's needs are not valued. The needs of the community to save money are more important.

Watch the videos on this site and know that you have been warned....

http://www.facesofgovernmenthealthcare.com/

Friday, May 1, 2009

Recessions are great at "spreading the wealth"


http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZDFiZTM5NTEzZDVhOWY2MDU3NTFjYzQ4YWY1OWI4MTI=


[I]f, in the abstract, liberals were given a deal in which economic inequality was reduced from its levels of the 1990s and 2000s, but at the price of 8.5 percent unemployment, wouldn’t they take it? Isn’t that the basic bargain embraced in the European model they so adore? Less wealth, less inequality, less employment — recession-era America already has some of the characteristics of a European social democracy.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Some wisdom from Sen. Schumer

It's what gives Washington and government a bad name. It's sheer stupidity.

It would be nice if he would apply this wisdom to the federal government's other stupid endeavors, not just to yesterday's Air Force One photo-op stunt.

Arlen Specter switches parties

Good riddance. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

"Tax cut" alert

I work for a small company and I'm really the only employee except the owner. He has an accountant who reviews my bookkeeping every month and he handles all the payroll and tax issues. I asked him yesterday (as I was preparing my payroll check) if I should change the withholding amount because I understood that the Obama tax cut passed by Congress (and heralded today by the President in his speech at noon), would give me an extra $7-$13 in my paycheck. Brian told me that I had a choice. He said I could "pay it now, or pay it next April." Not being an accountant, I asked him to please explain...

It seems that this "tax cut" is not really a tax cut at all. It's a "cut" in what is being withheld by the employer. But there is no mention of any actual tax cut in the tax tables. You STILL OWE THE SAME AMOUNT. The total tax will be due in April 2010, so you'll have to give it all back or hope that your deductions will counter balance what you owe. So if you got a nice refund this year (which is just a tax free loan to the government), it will be much smaller next year (multiply the higher balance you get times the number of paychecks and you'll have an idea.) And if you owed money this year, prepare to pay a lot more next year.

Congress and the President know this, of course, and the media should too, but it's not mentioned, except in a few places. So, do yourself a favor. Check this out, of course and if you confirm it, tell your employer to NOT "give" you the extra cash, unless you take it and put it in your piggy bank marked "IRS-due 4/15/10."

Cheers.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Health-Status insurance

A CATO policy paper on how "health-status insurance" could be the free-market fix for the health care industry we're looking for:

http://cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9986


This is very well written, and makes complete sense to me. The idea is to decouple short-term "health insurance" (that is, the premium you pay to cover this year's health insurance) from "health-status insurance" (which would cover the increased health insurance premiums you would have to pay if your medical situation worsens).

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Obama calls for "a world without nuclear weapons"

In response, I call for a world without swords. Look at how progressive and peace-loving I am!

Two thoughts on "The bow"

First - the White House issuing a statement denying that the President bowed to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia last week will force the Drive-Bys to cover the issue.

Second - When people see the video most people will know the White House is not just spinning, but lying. And they may wonder that if this White House lies so easily about something so obvious, what else might they lying about?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0409/White_House_No_bow_to_Saudi.html

Monday, April 6, 2009

Re: DC Opportunity Scholarships

Hope-and-change beat NR to the punch this time, although the analysis here is much better than mine.

Money quote:

If you have any doubt as to whether this program should exist, ask yourself a simple question: Would you enroll your children in violence-ridden D.C. public schools with decades-long records of academic failure? Bill and Hillary Clinton didn’t. Barack and Michelle Obama didn’t. Members of Congress don’t.

What about you? Would you enroll your children in those schools?


The DC Opportunity Scholarships issue provides a perfect test of the President's "I'm a pragmatist, not an ideologue" line that so many of his supporters believe. Those supporters should take a close look at this issue and ask themselves if the President and his administration are behaving pragmatically or ideologically.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

GM total confidence

As the anger welled up inside me after coughing up $800 in underpaid federal income taxes tonight, I couldn't help but think about those sappy GM total confidence ads that are all over television.

The voice-over tells us that "America needs a comeback". Apparently, America can't stage a comeback unless you (yes, you) don't go out right now and buy a GM. Concerned that you might not be able to afford a new car payment, especially if you lose your job? You shouldn't be, because GM will make your car payment for you if you lose your job. Think that buying a car, which depreciates as soon as you drive it off the lot, might not be the best investment you could make right now? Not to worry, as GM is guaranteeing the trade-in value of your car at NADA clean value. Apparently, GM decided not to publicize the fact that the federal government now backs their warranties as a part of their "total confidence" plan, but they very well could have -- it fits nicely into the whole picture.

Given that the federal government, for all intents and purposes, now controls and financially backs General Motors, I couldn't help but think about how much of my $800 underpayment (not to mention the thousands in withholding I already paid, at 0% interest) will end up in the pockets of idiots who go out and buy a car that they can't afford, lured in by the "total confidence" offered by Government Motors. I probably shouldn't think too much of it, though, since I'm already funding that idiot's mortgage, his idiot kid's college education, and his whole family's health insurance (well, I guess that last one won't take effect until next year). Why shouldn't I fund his car as well? I mean, that's the patriotic thing to do, right? I'd have to be some sort of cold-hearted selfish jackass to dare claim that I deserve the right to buy my own house, car, health care, or education with the money I earned. Right?

Stop making sense

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/04/stop_making_sense.html

It's neither the law nor the facts, but what you can get the jury to do.

While absorbing that concept, consider that about one third of the US population thinks the phrase, "to each according to his need, from each according to his abilities," is in the US Constitution. One third also believes that the US government conspired in the 911 attacks. A majority thinks sheep farts have more to do with temperature variations on earth than the ball of nuclear fire the size of 1.3 million earths that is eight light-minutes away.

And now, as stock markets plummet around the globe and our national debt is set to triple in just two years, the number of people who believe we are on the right track has tripled.

DC Opportunity Scholarships

A new study shows that kids in the program are now performing *better* academically than their public school counterparts. Of course, this study conveniently comes out just after the President kills the program. Perhaps the President can explain why his daughters deserve to attend Sidwell Friends but Deborah Parker's children do not.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123897492702491091.html

Obama promised that he was a pragmatist who would make decisions based on "what works", not on the "childish" political arguments of the past. Well, the DC voucher program works...

Monday, March 30, 2009

In unprecedented power grab, Bush seizes control of auto industry

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In an unprecedented expansion of Executive Branch power, President Bush demanded the resignation of General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner on Sunday. Wagoner immediately acquiesced to the White House demand, likely persuaded by speculation that Dick Cheney was prepared to waterboard him if he refused. This morning, Mr. Bush announced a breathtaking power-grab by guaranteeing the warranty of all GM cars and demanding that GM produce even larger gas-guzzling SUVs and pickup trucks. This comes on the heels of Henry Paulson's attempts last week to give the Treasury the power to seize any non-bank financial institution the President and the Treasury Secretary deem "too big to fail" -- in effect, giving the Bush White House the power to take control of any business they choose.

"Do these imperial constitution-shredding Bushies know no bounds to their ambition for power?", asked Paul Krugman in The New York Times. "Never before has the executive branch intruded this far into the private business dealings of citizens. This administration is violating the civil rights of its citizens right and left."

Vice President Cheney could not be reached for comment, although we think we saw him sneaking out of Mr. Wagoner's home in a black cloak with a team of killer ninjas.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

XKCD on bailouts

Given what I know of Randall's political leanings, I'm pretty impressed with this little gem on xkcd recently:

http://xkcd.com/558/

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Let there be Light

Tonight, at the encouragement of Hollywood celebrities and other stellar minds, we are supposed to turn out our lights and sit in the dark for an hour contemplating how we can save the planet in solidarity with everyone else sitting alone in the dark and feel good about ourselves. Instead - I'll be celebrating Human Achievement Hour as I'll be driving to and then watching some teenagers play a hockey game in an artificial ice rink in a warm building with all the lights on. And I will leave all the lights on in my home while I'm gone.

Watch the video here: http://cei.org/human-achievement-hour

And remember. The Dark Ages. They weren't good. That's why they were called "Dark." I wonder if the wizards of smart who think they have all the answers understand the irony of their "Earth Hour" darkness loving, self-importance. This charade reminds me of the celebrities who, in solidarity with the homeless in the '80s, would go downtown (cameras in tow, of course) where those poor souls lived, sit with them, eat out of cans and "share" their feelings with them to "raise awareness" and after it got a bit cold and tiresome would get themselves back to their big homes in Malibu and congratulate themselves on their "solidarity" with the homeless. All feeling and no doing. If those who participate in Earth Hour tonight actually believe in this idiocy, then they should permanently disconnect their electricity, their heat and sell their cars, their TVs, their IPods, their cell phones, their computers.. well you see where I'm going.

Friday, March 6, 2009

There are no poor people in America

This is probably my most controversial opinion. Now, I don't mean it quite literally -- there are people in this country who truly live in destitution. However, that's a very small minority, and if they were bright enough to avail themselves of existing government and charitable services, they'd be fine (that's a topic for another day). What I mean is that what passes for "poor" in the USA would be unimaginably rich for a good chunk of the world. Most of the "poor" in the US have air conditioning, a car, and cable television. It seems that at least a few of them have camera phones too, judging from this wonderful Michelle-Obama-working-a-soup-kitchen photo-op:


Tell me again how I'm a heartless rich person because I don't think I should have to pay for these people's houses, education (through college, now!), and health care.

Obama's radical budget

drives the US, perhaps inexorably, towards the model of the Western European social welfare states. I'm still holding out hope that Americans don't really want 20% unemployment, a 30% lower standard of living, and federally rationed health care. Maybe they won't realize it until it's too late.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

Mr. Obama's $3.6 trillion budget blueprint, by his own admission, redefines the role of government in our economy and society. The budget more than doubles the national debt held by the public, adding more to the debt than all previous presidents -- from George Washington to George W. Bush -- combined. It reduces defense spending to a level not sustained since the dangerous days before World War II, while increasing nondefense spending (relative to GDP) to the highest level in U.S. history. And it would raise taxes to historically high levels (again, relative to GDP). And all of this before addressing the impending explosion in Social Security and Medicare costs.

New and expanded refundable tax credits would raise the fraction of taxpayers paying no income taxes to almost 50% from 38%. This is potentially the most pernicious feature of the president's budget, because it would cement a permanent voting majority with no stake in controlling the cost of general government.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Bait-and-switch

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123621161271234665.html

Mr. Obama cannot dismiss critics by pointing to President George W. Bush's decision to run $2.9 trillion in deficits while fighting two wars and dealing with 9/11 and Katrina. Mr. Obama will surpass Mr. Bush's eight-year total in his first 20 months and 11 days in office, adding $3.2 trillion to the national debt. If America "cannot and will not sustain" deficits like Mr. Bush's, as Mr. Obama said during the campaign, how can Mr. Obama sustain the geometrically larger ones he's flogging?

There is more. Mr. Obama pledged "no tax hikes on any families earning less than a quarter million dollars." What he didn't draw attention to was $600 billion in higher energy taxes he wants to impose through a cap-and-trade system on carbon emissions. These taxes will hit everyone who drives, flips a light switch, or buys anything manufactured, grown or shipped.

The verdict is in

The market is down 25% year-to-date. How long will Team Obama and his sycophantic followers get away with blaming it all on George W. Bush and his failed policies of the past?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123604419092515347.html

Monday, March 2, 2009

Rahm and Rush - Divide and Conquer

Yesterday on the CBS Sunday show, Rahm Emmanuel made the statement that Rush Limbaugh is the voice of the Republican party.

This morning, Kevin Wahl, the guest host on the Bill Bennett show answered the question, although he didn't realize he was doing it. He actually fell right into team Obama's trap. Wahl focused on the obvious - that they are trying to "demonize" Rush because they need someone to run against in 2010. Just like the demonized Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich and, of course Bush.

But I think it's more devious than that and the callers to the Bennett show as well as Wahl himself made it obvious what that reason is. Team Obama need to divide the right before there actually IS a leader of the party/movement who rises to the top. They want us fighting amongst ourselves for that position instead of galvanizing around a single man or woman who is capable of doing the job. Caller after caller dutifully answered the call - Ron Paul, Richard Shelby, Tom Coburn were all mentioned as the REAL leader.

Team Obama also know the egos of the conservative media as well as the egos of elected politicians and they are counting on those egos to try to push their way to the front of that line - "No, Rush isn't the leader, I am" or "My candidate is the leader", in other words, "Let's fight amongst ourselves."

Yes - most conservatives will defend Rush, but those who aspire to fill the vacuum of leadership will try to use this opportunity to put themselves into the top position. This is what Team Obama is counting on and I'd bet my lunch money that this is their goal. So they get two birds with one stone - attack Rush and start a playground fight amongst their enemies and sit back and watch with glee as the bloodletting begins.

The Republicans are sometimes called the stupid party (and watching Spector et. al. it's not hard to understand why) and we have all seen this kind of internecine war before.

Obama is plenty smart. Whereas Clinton attacked Rush head on (the Oklahoma City bombing), Obama is getting his enemies to do the job for him.

Their problem is that Rush is smarter. He'll likely expose their real reason and be able to use it to his advantage, all at the same time. He will use this opportunity to expand his market and I can see the ads now.

"Obama says Rush is the leader of the conservative movement - find out for yourself - today noon to 3 on WTAM!"

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

We're running out of canaries

As we all know, the canary in the coal mine helped warn the miners of deadline methane gas buildup before it became dangerous to humans. As long as the canary was singing, the mine was safe. Once it stopped, it was time to evacuate the mine. The problem we have is that our enemies are building up their weapons and plans for our destruction, the canaries have all stopped singing, but the wizards of smart in DC aren't paying any attention. Iran's new currency features the satellite they have just successfully tested. They obviously think that piece of equipment is terribly important to their country and I don' think it's because they're all excited about getting XM radio or re-runs of Dallas. http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=86424&sectionid=3510212

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

50 de-stimulating facts

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjcyODIyZGM2MGU1ZDdkNDgxZDc3OTNjYjM4ZDY1ODI

$4000 per person

$1 trillion (dollars in the stimulus bill) / 250 million (american citizens of working age) = $4000 per citizen

Just write the checks. That would be a much better use of the money.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

The flip side...

In reacting to today's restrictions on executive pay imposed by the federal government, two things come to mind:
  1. Am I the only person who is scared to death by the fact that the federal government (actually, the President personally) is placing restrictions on salaries in the private sector? Is there anyone else left out there who believes in free markets? Or has everyone bought into the era of Hope and Change?
  2. Part of me says that the morons at these wall street firms who showed up in Washington with their damn hands out are getting exactly what they deserve. If you choose to be dependent on the government, the government now controls you. The rest of us out here in the real world should think long and hard about this episode before asking the government for our "universal" healthcare and our "affordable" housing.
  3. A companion story in today's news is that BoA's share price is dropping dangerously on worries that the government will take over the company. Don't people get it yet? The best thing that could happen for BoA, Wells, Chase, and the rest is for the feds to come out tomorrow and guarantee that they will not nationalize the banking industry. The market is scared to death that the little shareholder value left in these companies will be blown away if/when The Messiah decides he can run them better than their boards.

It's only a matter of time...

Before the President starts deciding how much YOU deserve to be paid:

http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/090204/business_us_obama.html?.v=9

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090204/D964VSP00.html

So, yeah, live it up, middle-class America, while your Messiah-in-chief tells those evil wall street CEOs how much they can be paid. I'm glad it makes you feel so good about yourselves.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Dear Mahmoud,

Please don't hate me! I'm soooo sorry George Bush was such an asshole. The US is definitely not willing to remove your government, and we don't really care if you sponsor terrorists and keep developing your nukes. Won't you be my friend? Pretty please?

Love,
Barry

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

The Generational Theft Act of 2009

That's what Michelle Malkin calls the stimulus bill. I think I like this name the best. It really captures the essence of what's happening here -- the current generation literally stealing money from their children. On top of the current $825 billion price tag, the CBO expects the stimulus to incur $347 billion in interest -- over just 10 years.

4.19 billion for ACORN

The bill uses the more generic "Neighborhood Stabilization Activities".

The European Social Welfare State Bill

That's what the corner is calling The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009.

It’s easy to go through a huge proposal and find what seem like fairly ridiculous line items, so I’ll focus on as comprehensive a view as I can of the spending. The CBO reviews each Title (basically, spending area) of the bill, and calls out major items within each Title. Here are all the items that I saw them identify as individual programs with more than $10 billion of projected outlays, in the order that they call them out:


  • $20.0 billion to increase the maximum benefit under the Supplemental Nutrition Assurance Program (i.e., Food Stamps)
  • $18.5 billion for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs
  • $20.4 billion for programs administered by the Department of health and Human Services
  • $20.0 billion to renovate elementary and secondary schools
  • $17.6 billion for Pell grants and other student financial assistance at post-secondary institutions
  • $29.1 billion for other elementary and secondary educational programs
  • $30.0 billion for highway construction
  • $13.1 billion for other transportation programs
  • $11.2 billion for housing assistance programs administered by HUD
  • $19.5 billion (minimum, could be higher, as per Title XIII) for education grants to states
  • $27.1 billion for increase unemployment benefits
  • $13.3 billion to increase health insurance for unemployed workers
  • $11.1 billion for “Other Unemployment Compensation”
  • $20.2 billion for Medicaid and Medicare incentive payments to encourage providers to improve healthcare IT

What does this sound like to you? It sounds to me like a wish list for the left wing of the Democratic Party.

Read the stimulus

readthestimulus.org provides an indexed search of the stimulus bill (which is currently 1588 pages long), along with some nice charts of the CBO analysis of the bill demonstrating that the vast majority of the outlay occurs after 2009.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

9/6/06 Bush address detailing CIA interrogations

In this speech, Bush explains how intelligence gathered from high-profile terrorists led to the capture of more terrorist operatives and helped thwart attacks. Full text here

These are some of the plots that have been stopped because of the information of this vital program. Terrorists held in CIA custody have also provided information that helped stop a planned strike on U.S. Marines at Camp Lemonier in Djibouti -- they were going to use an explosive laden water tanker. They helped stop a planned attack on the U.S. consulate in Karachi using car bombs and motorcycle bombs, and they helped stop a plot to hijack passenger planes and fly them into Heathrow or the Canary Wharf in London.

The most dangerous man ever to occupy the Oval Office

Marc Thiessen responds to the Executive orders on Gitmo and CIA interrogation procedures at the Corner.

A week ago, former Vice President Cheney advised the incoming president to take some time and look carefully at the policies and institutions the Bush administration had put in place to protect the country before following through on campaign pledges to dismantle them. President-elect Obama said on ABC’s This Week: “I think that was pretty good advice, which is I should know what’s going on before we make judgments and that we shouldn’t be making judgments on the basis of incomplete information or campaign rhetoric."

Less than 48 hours after taking office, Obama has begun dismantling those institutions without time for any such review. The CIA program he is effectively shutting down is the reason why America has not been attacked again after 9/11. He has removed the tool that is singularly responsible for stopping al-Qaeda from flying planes into the Library Tower in Los Angeles, Heathrow Airport, and London’s Canary Warf, and blowing up apartment buildings in Chicago, among other plots. It’s not even the end of inauguration week, and Obama is already proving to be the most dangerous man ever to occupy the Oval Office.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Dick Morris on Obama

Morris offers a fairly grim outlook on what Obama's term will mean for America.

2,688 Days

Marc Thiessen, chief speechwriter for President Bush, observes in the Washington Post that President Bush departed the office Tuesday after keeping the country safe from terrorist attack for 2,688 consecutive days. The column is a must-read.

Al-Qaeda is actively working to attack our country again. And the policies and institutions that George W. Bush put in place to stop this are succeeding. During the campaign, Obama pledged to dismantle many of these policies. He follows through on those pledges at America's peril -- and his own.

Unfortunately, Mr. Obama has already followed through on his promise to dismantle one of the policies Mr. Thiessen lists (enhanced interrogation techniques by the CIA, which were employed successfully to thwart planned attacks). I expect the others to follow in the days and months ahead.

By the authority vested in me...

I'm a bit disappointed that Mr. Obama chose to close Club Gitmo before conducting any sort of study to determine whether that course of action is really in the best interests of national security.

The most amusing part of the EO is the ostentatious expectation that Mr. Obama's magical diplomatic powers-of-persuasion will cause other nations to want to take the evil, derranged, and dangerous killers that currently populate Club Gitmo:


New diplomatic efforts may result in an appropriate disposition of a substantial number of individuals currently detained at Guantánamo.


Good luck with that. Personally, I like Rep. Bill Young's idea of sending the detainees to Alcatraz, right in the middle of Nancy Pelosi's district.

The return to September 10th

Today's executive order eliminating all interrogation techniques not listed in the Army Field Manual, officially granting Geneva Conventions protections to terrorists as a "baseline", and eliminating the CIA's ability to detain captives goes a long way towards rolling back our defense and intelligence apparatus to a pre-9/11 mindset. Amusingly, the order is quite explicit about the date to which it rolls back our capabilities:

All executive directives, orders, and regulations inconsistent with this order, including but not limited to those issued to or by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from September 11, 2001, to January 20, 2009, concerning detention or the interrogation of detained individuals, are revoked to the extent of their inconsistency with this order

Interpretations of Common Article 3 and the Army Field Manual. From this day forward, unless the Attorney General with appropriate consultation provides further guidance, officers, employees, and other agents of the United States Government may, in conducting interrogations, act in reliance upon Army Field Manual 2 22.3, but may not, in conducting interrogations, rely upon any interpretation of the law governing interrogation -- including interpretations of Federal criminal laws, the Convention Against Torture, Common Article 3, Army Field Manual 2 22.3, and its predecessor document, Army Field Manual 34 52 issued by the Department of Justice between September 11, 2001, and January 20, 2009.

Rebuilding our alliances?

On day two of his administration, Mr. Obama has delivered a speech that dramatically shifts US relations with Israel, our closest and most vital ally in the middle east. Mr. Obama demands that Israel lift its blockade of Gaza as part of a cease fire:

As part of a lasting ceasefire, Gaza’s border crossings should be open to allow the flow of aid and commerce, with an appropriate monitoring regime, with the international and Palestinian Authority participating

He also expressed his deep concern about the effect of Israel's recent action against Hamas:

I was deeply concerned by the loss of Palestinian and Israeli life in recent days and by the substantial suffering and humanitarian needs in Gaza.

In addition, in what Israel could rightly interpret as a slight, President Obama made his frist phone call in that capacity to the leader of Fatah, Mahmud Abbas.

From a man who pledged to "rebuild our alliances", it seems an odd move to undermine an ally within the first 48 hours of taking the oath. But I must recall that when the Left speaks of our "alliances", they're speaking exclusively of socialist Western European states who just couldn't stand that horrid cowboy from Texas who refused to negotiate with terrorists, and consistently supported those awful Jews. Sorry, I forgot about that.

Tom Brokaw vs. the bigots and rednecks

Tuesday morning on MSNBC, Tom Brokaw reflected thusly on the inauguration of Mr. Obama:

Listen, I just want to say one thing. Having been in the South in the '60s and Los Angeles, in Watts and northern urban areas, when we were evolving as a country, I'm thinking of all the bigots and rednecks and people I met along the way. I'm saying to them, "Take this." You know?

I love this quote, because it encapsulates both the arrogance and condescension of Mr. Brokaw and his ilk. You see, Tom has always been a visionary who is better than those bigots and rednecks down in the south -- he even was way back in the 60s! This is how he views America, as a place filled with racist bigots who have been put in their place by the election of Barack the Great, an outcome that Mr. Brokaw and company fought so hard for during the campaign.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

whitehouse.gov == barackobama.com

The new whitehouse.gov makes it clear that the Obama team intends to maintain its brand image continually for the next four years. In addition to having the same design elements of the campaign website, it contains a bunch of re-tread campaign rhetoric. Especially inappropriate for a Presidential website is the bashing of the former President that is scattered about.

Katrina

President Obama will keep the broken promises made by President Bush to rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast...President Obama swiftly responded to Hurricane Katrina. Citing the Bush Administration's "unconscionable ineptitude" in responding to Hurricane Katrina, then-Senator Obama introduced legislation...


Iraq

Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe we must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in.


Can they really believe that stuff about Katrina? Calling a former President unconscionably inept on dailykos is one thing, but on whitehouse.gov? It also seems unwise from a diplomatic standpoint to say that your country was "careless" in its engagement with Iraq (which is now an extremely important strategic ally), but I guess that ship sailed a long time ago.

Everyone hates on Grover

In his inauguration address, Barack Obama said:

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath

Actually, Mr. President, that would be 43 Americans. Grover Cleveland was the 22nd and 24th President, so although you are the 44th President, you are the 43rd distinct American to serve as President.

Is dissent still patriotic?

I stumbled across a great Denver Post column today. It picks up on many of the thoughts I've been having since the inauguration yesterday. Some highlights:

Is there anyone who still believes the Constitution was created to ensure each citizen liberty and the ability to pursue happiness rather than a guarantee of happiness — and a retirement fund, health care, a job, an education, a house ... ?

Obama challenges Americans to have "a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves." So if you find massive concentrated power in Washington a turn-on, you've found your higher purpose.

But surely, most of you have found meaning in something greater than yourselves long before some politician demanded it.

To require such fealty to power in the name of patriotism was once repugnant to the left. Now, with the right guy in charge, apparently it can once again be embraced.

Ought I to be offended?

In his benediction to close the inaugural festivities, the Rev. Joseph Lowery asked the following of the almighty:
we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around ... when yellow will be mellow ... when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right
Really? When "white will embrace what is right"? So much for a post-racial Presidency.

Text of the Inauguration Benediction

by Rev. Joseph Lowery

God of our weary years, God of our silent tears, thou, who has brought us thus far along the way, thou, who has by thy might led us into the light, keep us forever in the path we pray, lest our feet stray from the places, our God, where we met thee, lest our hearts drunk with the wine of the world, we forget thee.

Shadowed beneath thy hand, may we forever stand true to thee, oh God, and true to our native land.

We truly give thanks for the glorious experience we've shared this day.

We pray now, oh Lord, for your blessing upon thy servant Barack Obama, the 44th president of these United States, his family and his administration.

He has come to this high office at a low moment in the national, and indeed the global, fiscal climate. But because we know you got the whole world in your hands, we pray for not only our nation, but for the community of nations.

Our faith does not shrink though pressed by the flood of mortal ills.

For we know that, Lord, you are able and you're willing to work through faithful leadership to restore stability, mend our brokenness, heal our wounds, and deliver us from the exploitation of the poor, of the least of these, and from favoritism toward the rich, the elite of these.

We thank you for the empowering of thy servant, our 44th president, to inspire our nation to believe that yes we can work together to achieve a more perfect union.

And while we have sown the seeds of greed — the wind of greed and corruption, and even as we reap the whirlwind of social and economic disruption, we seek forgiveness and we come in a spirit of unity and solidarity to commit our support to our president by our willingness to make sacrifices, to respect your creation, to turn to each other and not on each other.

And now, Lord, in the complex arena of human relations, help us to make choices on the side of love, not hate; on the side of inclusion, not exclusion; tolerance, not intolerance.

And as we leave this mountain top, help us to hold on to the spirit of fellowship and the oneness of our family. Let us take that power back to our homes, our workplaces, our churches, our temples, our mosques, or wherever we seek your will.

Bless President Barack, First Lady Michelle. Look over our little angelic Sasha and Malia.

We go now to walk together as children, pledging that we won't get weary in the difficult days ahead. We know you will not leave us alone.

With your hands of power and your heart of love, help us then, now, Lord, to work for that day when nations shall not lift up sword against nation, when tanks will be beaten into tractors, when every man and every woman shall sit under his or her own vine and fig tree and none shall be afraid, when justice will roll down like waters and righteousness as a mighty stream.

Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around ... when yellow will be mellow ... when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen.

Text of the Inauguration Poem

"Praise Song for the Day, A Poem for Barack Obama's Presidential Inauguration"

By Elizabeth Alexander

Each day we go about our business,
walking past each other, catching each other’s
eyes or not, about to speak or speaking.

All about us is noise. All about us is
noise and bramble, thorn and din, each
one of our ancestors on our tongues.

Someone is stitching up a hem, darning
a hole in a uniform, patching a tire,
repairing the things in need of repair.

Someone is trying to make music somewhere,
with a pair of wooden spoons on an oil drum,
with cello, boom box, harmonica, voice.

A woman and her son wait for the bus.
A farmer considers the changing sky.
A teacher says, Take out your pencils. Begin.

We encounter each other in words, words
spiny or smooth, whispered or declaimed,
words to consider, reconsider.

We cross dirt roads and highways that mark
the will of some one and then others, who said
I need to see what’s on the other side.

I know there’s something better down the road.
We need to find a place where we are safe.
We walk into that which we cannot yet see.

Say it plain: that many have died for this day.
Sing the names of the dead who brought us here,
who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges,

picked the cotton and the lettuce, built
brick by brick the glittering edifices
they would then keep clean and work inside of.

Praise song for struggle, praise song for the day.
Praise song for every hand-lettered sign,
the figuring-it-out at kitchen tables.

Some live by love thy neighbor as thyself,
others by first do no harm or take no more
than you need. What if the mightiest word is love?

Love beyond marital, filial, national,
love that casts a widening pool of light,
love with no need to pre-empt grievance.

In today’s sharp sparkle, this winter air,
any thing can be made, any sentence begun.
On the brink, on the brim, on the cusp,

praise song for walking forward in that light.

Text of the Inaugural Address

My fellow citizens: I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you've bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors.

I thank President Bush for his service to our nation -- (applause) -- as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often, the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because we, the people, have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears and true to our founding documents.

So it has been; so it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost, jobs shed, businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly, our schools fail too many -- and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable, but no less profound, is a sapping of confidence across our land; a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, that the next generation must lower its sights.

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this America: They will be met. (Applause.)

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord. On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics. We remain a young nation. But in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness. (Applause.)

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of short-cuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the faint-hearted, for those that prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things -- some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor -- who have carried us up the long rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life. For us, they toiled in sweatshops, and settled the West, endured the lash of the whip, and plowed the hard earth. For us, they fought and died in places like Concord and Gettysburg, Normandy and Khe Sahn.

Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions, greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week, or last month, or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions -- that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America. (Applause.)

For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of our economy calls for action, bold and swift. And we will act, not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We'll restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. All this we will do.

Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short, for they have forgotten what this country has already done, what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage. What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them, that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply.

The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works -- whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched. But this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control. The nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity, on the ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart -- not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good. (Applause.)

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers -- (applause) -- our Founding Fathers, faced with perils that we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man -- a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience sake. (Applause.)

And so, to all the other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born, know that America is a friend of each nation, and every man, woman and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity. And we are ready to lead once more. (Applause.)

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with the sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles once more we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort, even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we'll work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back the specter of a warming planet.

We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense. And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken -- you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you. (Applause.)

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West, know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. (Applause.)

To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist. (Applause.)

To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to the suffering outside our borders, nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

As we consider the role that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who at this very hour patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages.

We honor them not only because they are the guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service -- a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves.

And yet at this moment, a moment that will define a generation, it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all. For as much as government can do, and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our darkest hours. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a child that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends -- honesty and hard work, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism -- these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history.

What is demanded, then, is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility -- a recognition on the part of every American that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world; duties that we do not grudgingly accept, but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship. This is the source of our confidence -- the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny. This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed, why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent mall; and why a man whose father less than 60 years ago might not have been served in a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath. (Applause.)

So let us mark this day with remembrance of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At the moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words to be read to the people:

"Let it be told to the future world...that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive... that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet [it]."

America: In the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism

...or so we've been told over the last eight years. While I understand the sentiment, I don't hold to it, and I suspect that many of those who did have already done an about-face. However, it is important to engage on the issues of the day, and to take issue with those wielding political power when we disagree with them. That's what we're going to do here. Welcome to Hope and Change, a blog of the Obama Era that will not be blinded by over-the-top worship of the Dear Leader, nor by the deranged hatred of the President that we saw for the last eight years.